http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/ There are a limited number of profound statements in this world Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:04:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=MU hourly 1 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/#comment-21082 davidillsley Mon, 22 Oct 2007 07:53:01 +0000 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/#comment-21082 Hmm Paul, sounds like a challenge! I'll try to find the time to try out both and let you know how it goes. (Though I'm sure you're right that the REST form is simpler). Hmm Paul, sounds like a challenge! I’ll try to find the time to try out both and let you know how it goes. (Though I’m sure you’re right that the REST form is simpler).

]]> http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/#comment-20986 Paul Downey :: Mojo! Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:06:12 +0000 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/#comment-20986 [...] best pleased Norm and David like Mojo. Both seemed concerned about outing us, but shouldn’t worry. There’s nothing [...] [...] best pleased Norm and David like Mojo. Both seemed concerned about outing us, but shouldn’t worry. There’s nothing [...]

]]> http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/#comment-20981 Paul Downey Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:40:45 +0000 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/19/mojo/#comment-20981 Ha! I should have told you it's ok to talk about Mojo, guess I should blog about it too! Actually for a Web services guru like yourself might be interested in some documentation we threw up (pun intended) on calling the SDK services directly: http://web21c.bt.com/howtos/diy_web_service_calls. You can now see why REST will win ;-) Ha! I should have told you it’s ok to talk about Mojo, guess I should blog about it too! Actually for a Web services guru like yourself might be interested in some documentation we threw up (pun intended) on calling the SDK services directly: http://web21c.bt.com/howtos/diy_web_service_calls. You can now see why REST will win

]]>