Comments on: SemWeb http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/ There are a limited number of profound statements in this world Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:45:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Paul Miller http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/#comment-20898 Paul Miller Wed, 17 Oct 2007 05:41:33 +0000 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/#comment-20898 Ah,thenweagree!!!:-) Ah,thenweagree!!!:-)

]]> By: davidillsley http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/#comment-20850 davidillsley Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:34:50 +0000 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/#comment-20850 :-) I was agreeing with you. There's huge potential in the existing data on the web/in the cloud(s), without having to get to the all encompasing ontological wonder. It would just help if so much of it wasn't in impermeable clouds! :-) I was agreeing with you.

There’s huge potential in the existing data on the web/in the cloud(s), without having to get to the all encompasing ontological wonder. It would just help if so much of it wasn’t in impermeable clouds!

]]> By: Paul Miller http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/#comment-20847 Paul Miller Tue, 16 Oct 2007 08:12:31 +0000 http://log.illsley.org/2007/10/15/semweb/#comment-20847 ...just trying to work out if you were agreeing with me or not... ;-) Paul (who really doesn't want to see 3.0.4.11, and who's sure that semantic technologies have a lot to offer long before we reach The Semantic Web) …just trying to work out if you were agreeing with me or not… ;-)

Paul (who really doesn’t want to see 3.0.4.11, and who’s sure that semantic technologies have a lot to offer long before we reach The Semantic Web)

]]>