<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source is Open Source, right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://log.illsley.org/2007/05/29/open-source-is-open-source-right/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://log.illsley.org/2007/05/29/open-source-is-open-source-right/</link>
	<description>There are a limited number of profound statements in this world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 07:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidillsley</title>
		<link>http://log.illsley.org/2007/05/29/open-source-is-open-source-right/#comment-10598</link>
		<dc:creator>davidillsley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.illsley.org/2007/05/29/open-source-is-open-source-right/#comment-10598</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know how to take that comment.

I genuinely don&#039;t have an axe to grind with OpenJDK. Yes, I&#039;m skeptical about it (specifically its governance, especially in the short term) but I have nothing personal to gain by its success or failure (well, actually, as someone who makes a living by writing Java code, I probably do have something to gain if it succeeds and lose if it fails).

I take your point about making it appear that you&#039;re defining policy, but in some sense I hope/believe you are, that&#039;s one of the things  I believe open source is about - decisions made by the community, and you&#039;re presenting yourself as part of the community.

More broadly though, it does reflect other statements I&#039;ve seen from others talking about OpenJDK - that people shouldn&#039;t worry about politics and governance because the important thing is that the code is there. If your post was the first thing I&#039;d seen with that sentiment I wouldn&#039;t have commented.

If you don&#039;t think your views reflect the views of many in the OpenJDK community I&#039;ll be happy to update the post to reflect that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know how to take that comment.</p>
<p>I genuinely don&#8217;t have an axe to grind with OpenJDK. Yes, I&#8217;m skeptical about it (specifically its governance, especially in the short term) but I have nothing personal to gain by its success or failure (well, actually, as someone who makes a living by writing Java code, I probably do have something to gain if it succeeds and lose if it fails).</p>
<p>I take your point about making it appear that you&#8217;re defining policy, but in some sense I hope/believe you are, that&#8217;s one of the things  I believe open source is about &#8211; decisions made by the community, and you&#8217;re presenting yourself as part of the community.</p>
<p>More broadly though, it does reflect other statements I&#8217;ve seen from others talking about OpenJDK &#8211; that people shouldn&#8217;t worry about politics and governance because the important thing is that the code is there. If your post was the first thing I&#8217;d seen with that sentiment I wouldn&#8217;t have commented.</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t think your views reflect the views of many in the OpenJDK community I&#8217;ll be happy to update the post to reflect that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas Sterbenz</title>
		<link>http://log.illsley.org/2007/05/29/open-source-is-open-source-right/#comment-10581</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas Sterbenz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://log.illsley.org/2007/05/29/open-source-is-open-source-right/#comment-10581</guid>
		<description>Great example. I talk about code. You make it appear I am defining policy for OpenJDK, and then use that policy to criticize OpenJDK. Nothing to do with furthering agendas of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great example. I talk about code. You make it appear I am defining policy for OpenJDK, and then use that policy to criticize OpenJDK. Nothing to do with furthering agendas of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
